ARCHIVES


Mayor Claar Restricts Public Access To Village Trustees


 

Lets find out what the surrounding communities are doing.

 

Then you decide.

 

 

What are they hiding?

 

Is it possible the only one with answers to tough questions are Mayor Claar and Village Attorney Boan? 

 

Why can't we address the board with questions?

 

 

 

 

If you have a question for the Village board, there's a few steps that must be followed, and no guarantee your questions will be answered.

 

For example -

 

1.  Questions are required to be submitted before the meeting.  No guarantee you will get an answer.

 

2.  When asking questions, you MUST address the Mayor.  Speakers are not allowed to address board members directly.


 

How is this possible in America?  Anytime there's restriction on public information and access-denied  to our elected officials, we should be concerned. 


The Number Crunchers set out to determine if this was an isolated case, or common practice.  So we decided to contact several communities in the surrounding area, to ask if they have similar rules in place.


 

Here's what we discovered.


1. VILLAGE OF ROMEOVILLE - None

2. CITY OF NAPERVILLE - None

3. VILLAGE OF LISLE - None

4. VILLAGE OF WOODRIDGE - None

5. VILLAGE OF DOWNERS GROVE - None


That's right! None of the communities listed above place such restrictions on it's residents.   Whereas, in Bolingbrook, we are not allowed to address any of the 6 trustees at a board meeting. 


Somethin' stinks!

Now you decide.  As a resident of Bolingbrook, do you agree with these restrictions?


 


 

Villlage of Bolingbrook

 

Did you know?


The Village of Bolingbrook pays a local landscaping business millions to maintain various properties in the Village.


 

One problem, many of the jobs performed by this independent company can be done by our public works department at a fraction of the cost.


So how are we saving money, exactly?

 

 

 

August 25, 2010


By Rhonda Reed-Slaughter



At the recent village board meeting, Mayor Claar announced several capital improvement projects in the works this year.  According to the Mayor, the projects will be funded by the motor fuel tax collected by the Village.  This news was immediately published in the Bolingbrook Sun.


When we heard the news, several questions came to mind. 

 

1.  The location and type of improvements?  

2.  Total cost ?

3.  Which company will be awarded the contract?



One specific project piqued our interest, so we decided to delve into the detail a bit more.


Project:  The Median Improvements on Route 53

 

 

 

FACTS
* median imprvmts between Remington Blvd and Royce Rd.

 

* Bolingbrook's portion of cost - $516,000

 

* funded by motor fuel tax revenue

 

* type of improvements
  1. demolish & extend retaining walls

  2. build new walls around the median

  3.  preserve existing plants

  4.  add new plants

 

 

We were surprised to learn, many of the improvements (listed above) can be done by our very own public works department.  So why would the Village choose to have an independent company step in to complete the project?  How are we saving money by paying an independent company a minimum $500k, when we have a staff of public work employees that are being paid a salary to do the same work?

 

 

Upon further investigation, we discovered one landscaping company in Bolingbrook that's made millions off the taxpayers for many years. 

 

Basically performing some of the same duties as our public works department.

 

 

 

WALSH LANDSCAPING  

Walsh Landscaping charged taxpayers (via the Village) millions of dollars to maintain various properties in Bolingbrook.

 

According to the Village Treasurer's Report -

 

2009  - $1,202,458

2008  - $1,617,671

2007  - $1,118,649

2006  - $1,166,717

 

 

 

 

THE TYPE OF SERVICE PROVIDED BY WALSH LANDSCAPING

Per receipt copies from the Village of Bolingbrook

 

 

Watering various areas

* Walsh charges taxpayers $92.00 per hour, per person

    to water the lawn and medians. 

 

* In fiscal year 09/10, taxpayers paid approximately $32,000

   for watering service.

 

* According to a source, several medians have an

   underground sprinkler system.  Unfortunately, the

   village never set the timers.

 

 

 

Preserving Existing Plants

* Walsh maint. contract cost taxpayers $117k in 09/10.

 

* Route 53/I-55 maint. contract is costing taxpayers

   $3,131 per month.

 

 

 

Adding New Plants

* In June, 2008, Walsh charged taxpayers $79k for Island

   Planters on Rte53/I55.

 

* In July, 2008, Walsh charged taxpayers $38.9k to replace 

   plants at Rte 53 / I55.

 

* In fiscal year 2010, Walsh charged us $135k to plant street

   trees.

 

 

 

As you can see, many of the jobs performed by Walsh Landscaping can be done by our public works department at a fraction of the cost. 

 

So why would the Village choose to pay "premium" for basic service?

 

 

 

 

WALSH'S CAMPAIGN CONTRIBUTIONS TO MAYOR CLAAR

According to records obtained by the Illinois Board of Elections, Walsh Landscaping contributed approximately $44,500 to Mayor Claar's campaign since 2002.

 

Is it just a coincidence?  Walsh contributes $44k to Claar's campaign, then receive million dollar contracts every year. 

 

What a lucrative investment.

 

 

 

FINAL COMMENT

The first step in the Village's plan is to "demolish" the existing walls.   Have you seen the bricks used to build those retaining walls?  Very attractive, and expensive.

 

According to a source, those bricks can cost $4.99 to $10.00 retail. 

 

Here's an idea, why not have the public works department remove the bricks (instead of demolishing them), load them on a pallet, and sell them for $1.00 per brick to residents.  At least we can recoup some of the cost.

 

Just an idea. 

 

 

Source:  Village of Bolingbrook Treasurers Report (2005-2009), copies of receits from Walsh Landscaping,Illinois Board of Elections, Bolingbrook Sun and Village of Bolingbrook.


 

Valley View School District


 

Gary Grizaffi, Assistant Superintendent

 

Answer Our Questions

 

 

 

Great news!

 

A public hearing was held Monday, September 27, 2010 for the final approval of VVSD 365U's 2010-11 budget.   

 

The Number Crunchers' are in the process of reviewing the budget, and have contacted Gary Grizaffi, the Assistant Superintendent of Finance to assist with questions.

 

We appreciate Assistant Superintendent Grizaffi's comments, and hope that the question and answers will help readers understand  the financial issues facing the school district.

 

 

 

 

The following questions were answered by Grizaffi in September, 2010.

 

 

The expenditures for this fiscal year is approximately $1 million more than last year.  Why?  Considering the budget cuts, etc.

 

Even with $11.7 million being reduced from this year's budget, we still have growth in our operational costs. Many of our costs are fixed, such as salaries and benefits. Medical claims costs continue to increase, even with decreases in our fixed costs in this area.  Transportation fuel costs are budgeted for an increase. Not all of our line items received a decrease year over year.   The actual change in budgeted expenditures from FY10 to FY11 is an decrease of $1.79 million.

 

Our biggest problem is the decline in revenue from the state. We received almost $4.2 million less in state reimbursement in FY10 and a $4.3 million decrease for FY11. This is in addition to the monies they have not paid from FY10, which is $5.7 million. So last year we received $9.73 million less in state payments from the prior year (FY09). That is a big hit in your revenue stream.

 

 

 

 

 

How much in state aid/reimb. does the district expect to receive in fiscal year 2010-11?  Did you exclude or include those numbers in the budget?

 

If the state fails to make the final payment, is it safe to assume the district will end up with a budget deficit for last fiscal year of approximately $5 million?  And reserves will need to be used?

 

We are expecting $33 million in state reimbursements, which is a combination of FY10 and FY11 MCAT reimbursements. I have incorporated whatever the Governor has assembled as of August 2nd in terms of school funding, and the ISBE staff information that we are most likely to receive only 25% of our MCAT funding for FY11. That can change in November during the General Assembly?s? Veto Session, or with the next gubernatorial election.

 

How do I make that up, or cover it? The only way is to use fund balance reserves, or borrow the money, which is not necessary at this time.

 

 

 

 

Have the state made its final payment?  If so, was it received before August 31, 2010.

 

The state has made very few payments to schools for the FY10 backlog since late July. Our auditor has told us in order to be booked into the proper fiscal year, the payments from the state had to be received no later than August 31st. The state has given itself thru recent legislation until December 31st to pay school districts what they are owed.

 

We had no choice but to close with a deficit budget for FY10 with the state owing us $5.7 million. If we had received that amount by August 31st, we would actually close with a positive balance in our operating funds for FY10 of approximately $128,627. Because we use the accrual method of accounting, we book receipts and payments in the proper year in which they belong.

 

We continue to monitor our cash flow and fund balances both short and long term to keep Valley View as solvent as possible. We attempt to balance a first class delivery of services balanced with fiscal responsibility. It is becoming increasingly difficult to do that when we have no consistency in our revenue stream with the state becoming more and more undependable for payments we have received on a consistent basis in the past.

 

 

Click to view 2010/11 Budget


  


 

U.S. Court of Appeals Ruled

Illinois Law Mandating A Moment of Silence in Public Schools Constitutional


 

 

 

October 26, 2010



 By Rhonda Reed-Slaughter



Recently, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 7th Circuit ruled the Illinois law mandating a moment of silence in public schools to be constitutional.


This ruling has reignite a passionate debate between religious groups that support prayer in schools, and groups/ individuals that fight to preserve our First Amendment right, the separation of church and state.


One individual sparking a debate right here in Illinois is Robert Sherman, a devout atheist and talk show host that publicly criticized his daughter's school for requiring a moment of silence before class.  As a result, he took his case to court.  The ACLU joined Sherman in protest of the Illinois law. 

 

 

When did the Illinois law pass?

 On October 11,2007, the Illinois General Assembly passed a law that changed it from permitting teachers to begin the school day with a moment of silence to requiring that they begin the day with a moment of silence.

 

 

How did the leaders in our district vote?


BRENT HASSERT (R) - State Representative  (85th district) - voted yes.

 

 

AJ WILHELMI (D) - State Senate (43rd district) - voted yes.



 

 

What's the detail behind the law?

The Illinois law titled The Silent Reflection and Student Prayer Act (SB1463, PA 095-680), states "In each public school class room the teacher shall observe a brief period of silence with the participation of all pupils therein assembled at the opening of every school day." 

 

 

 

 

Robert Sherman / ACLU's position and court rulings

Robert Sherman, and the ACLU believe the Illinois law promotes Christianity; thus, violating the First Amendment. 

 

In 2009, U.S. District Judge Robert Gettleman ruled that "the statue has a potential chilling effect on First Amendment Rights", and ruled the Illinois Law unconstitutional.

 

The case was immediately appealed.  The U.S. Court of Appeals for the 7th Circuit disagreed with Judge Gettleman's ruling, and sided with the Illinois General Assembly law; thus, ruling it constitutional.

 

 

 

 

 

What's the U.S. Supreme Court's opinion on Prayer in Schools?

The United States Supreme Court have found the following to be unconstitutional.

 

* actual prayers in school (1962)

 

* bible readings and the Lord's Prayer (1963)

 

* a moment of silence specifically for prayer (1985)

 

 

The U.S. Supreme Court have not addressed the question of "whether or not it's unconstitutional for a State to provide for a moment of silence at the start of school days?"

 

However, the Illinois General Assembly passed the law and the U.S. Court of Appeals (7th Circuit) upheld it.

 

Robert Sherman and the ACLU may take this question all the way to the Supreme Court.  Stay tuned.

 

So what do you think of The Silent Reflection and Student Prayer Act?



Source:  95th Illinois General Assembly, ACLU.com, Freedomforum.org, Chicago Tribune 1/24/09, Wikipedia.

 


 

Residents Voice Their Opinion

On the issues they care about

 

 

As a communiy website, we encourage resident participation, and will be publishing comments from readers.  With their permission of course.

 

So if the mood hits you and you've got something interesting to say, simply drop us a note. 

 

The community would love to hear from you.

 

 

Click below to view comments from readers.

 

 

FELIX PUBLISH AN OPEN LETTER TO HIS SUPPORTERS

By Felix Greco

 

 

 

TWO BOLINGBROOK RESIDENTS RAISE IMPORTANT QUESTIONS ABOUT WAREHOUSE WORKER ABUSE

By A Concerned Citizen & Shirley V.

 

 

 

 

DON'T CALL BACK THE TEACHERS & GOVERNMENT WORKERS ARE PAID TOO MUCH MONEY

By:  Bolingbrook Taxpayer

 

 

 

 

A SPECIAL MESSAGE TO OUR ELECTED OFFICIALS

By:  Felix Greco

 

 

I SUPPORT CEDRA CRENSHAW

By:  Resident

 

 

UNIONS ARE THE PROBLEM, NOT THE VILLAGE

By:  Anonymous

 

 

 

MY  SPEECH TO THE  VVSD 365U SCHOOL BOARD

By:  Mindy

 

 

 

THE U.S. PUBLIC SCHOOL SYSTEM IS FLAWED

By:  Greg



 

Illinois Supreme Court 

Chief Justice

Thomas L. Kilbride

 


 

 

2010 Budget Talk

Understanding Government Budgets

It's as simple as basic math

 

click here



 

 

 

Water Agency Update!


State Senator, Dan Cronin, R-Elmhurst has sponsored a bill that will move DuPage Water Commission to county government control.  The bill passed the Illinois Senate on April 15, 2010. 

 

The measure will now go to the Illinois House of Representatives.

 

Why is this important to Bolingbrook residents?   Well, several weeks ago, Mayor Claar, and the Village Board approved an intergovernmental agreement with Bolingbrook and several other communities in the area.  The approved ordinance moves the Village closer to creating a water agency.

 

To read more about the water agency debate, read article below.


 

Village Board Moves Bolingbrook Closer to Water Independence

Can the decision really save us money? 

 

you decide


 

 

New Name For Our Village Board

BOLINGBROOK'S BLACKBOARD

 

read more of this fascinating story


 

9-1-1 Dispatchers

Understaffed and Overworked


Budget cut casualties - click to read more

 


 

Learn How The Village Generates Revenue

thru

CONSUMPTION TAXES

 

It will surprise you

 



 

Mayor Claar & Village Board Approves Budget

Despite resident outrage.

 

Read what happened